DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Ford Mustang vs 2005 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

72.25–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
MustangModelMustang
2005Model year2005
CabrioletBody typeCoupe
2+2Seats4
2Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,0 s
180 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3813 ccEngine displacement4009 cc
190 HPPower212 HP
220 NmTorque325 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank61 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
205/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4653 mmLength4765 mm
1857 mmWidth1875 mm
1350 mmHeight1385 mm
1455 KgWeight1530 Kg
2573 mmWheelbase2720 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Ford Mustang and 2005 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…