2000 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 3.8 V6 (190 Hp) 2000Overall Score69.25/100
2000 Ford Mustang vs 2000 Buick Regal Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Buick
Regal
Buick Regal 3.8 V6 (203 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Ford Mustang
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MustangSpecificationBuick Regal
FordMakeBuick
MustangModelRegal
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Ford MustangSpecificationBuick Regal
—0–100 km/h9,2 s
180 km/hTop speed195 km/h
3813 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
190 HPPower203 HP
220 NmTorque305 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MustangSpecificationBuick Regal
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank64 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MustangSpecificationBuick Regal
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4 Hydramatic
205/65 R15Tyre size215/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MustangSpecificationBuick Regal
4653 mmLength4983 mm
1857 mmWidth1847 mm
1350 mmHeight1438 mm
1455 KgWeight1600 Kg
2573 mmWheelbase2769 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Mustang and 2000 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…