2000 • Ford
Mustang
Ford Mustang 3.8 V6 (190 Hp) 2000Overall Score69.25/100
2000 Ford Mustang vs 2000 Pontiac Bonneville Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Pontiac
Bonneville
Pontiac Bonneville 3.8 i V6 SE/SLE (203 Hp) 2000Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Ford Mustang
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MustangSpecificationPontiac Bonneville
FordMakePontiac
MustangModelBonneville
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Ford MustangSpecificationPontiac Bonneville
—0–100 km/h8,7 s
180 km/hTop speed175 km/h
3813 ccEngine displacement3791 cc
190 HPPower203 HP
220 NmTorque312 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MustangSpecificationPontiac Bonneville
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption12,1 lt
7,9 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MustangSpecificationPontiac Bonneville
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
205/65 R15Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MustangSpecificationPontiac Bonneville
4653 mmLength5146 mm
1857 mmWidth1885 mm
1350 mmHeight1438 mm
1455 KgWeight1670 Kg
2573 mmWheelbase2850 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Ford Mustang and 2000 Pontiac Bonneville approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…