DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Ford Mustang vs 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mustang

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.25–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeOldsmobile
MustangModelCutlass
1995Model year1995
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

5,0 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed200 km/h
3797 ccEngine displacement3340 cc
147 HPPower162 HP
292 NmTorque251 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
205/65 R15Tyre size185/75 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4610 mmLength4555 mm
1823 mmWidth1700 mm
1341 mmHeight1330 mm
1472 KgWeight1200 Kg
2553 mmWheelbase2625 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Ford Mustang and 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mustang leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…