DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Ford Mustang vs 2014 Ford Flex Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Flex

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFord
MustangModelFlex
2015Model year2014
CabrioletBody typeSUV
4Seats6-7
2Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3726 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
304 HPPower364 HP
366 NmTorque475 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank71 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
8,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt
11,2 ltAverage consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
235/55 R17Tyre size235/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4783 mmLength5130 mm
1915 mmWidth1930 mm
1394 mmHeight1727 mm
2720 mmWheelbase2995 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Ford Mustang and 2014 Ford Flex approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Flex leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…