DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Mondeo vs 2004 BMW X3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.75–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford MondeoSpecificationBMW X3
FordMakeBMW
MondeoModelX3
2003Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Ford MondeoSpecificationBMW X3
8,7 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
223 km/hTop speed198 km/h
2198 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
155 HPPower150 HP
360 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford MondeoSpecificationBMW X3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
56 ltFuel tank67 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford MondeoSpecificationBMW X3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size235/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford MondeoSpecificationBMW X3
4731 mmLength4569 mm
1812 mmWidth1853 mm
1429 mmHeight1674 mm
1410 KgWeight1750 Kg
2754 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Mondeo and 2004 BMW X3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…