2002 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi (130 Hp) 2002Overall Score64.75/100
2002 Ford Mondeo vs 2002 Saab 9-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0 t (175 Hp) 2002Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Saab 9-3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationSaab 9-3
FordMakeSaab
MondeoModel9-3
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationSaab 9-3
9,8 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
208 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
130 HPPower175 HP
330 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank62 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationSaab 9-3
4731 mmLength4635 mm
1812 mmWidth1762 mm
1429 mmHeight1434 mm
1460 KgWeight1580 Kg
2754 mmWheelbase2675 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Ford Mondeo and 2002 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Saab 9-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…