DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1984 Alpine A310 vs 2000 Toyota Supra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Supra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 35.25 points.

47.25–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AlpineMakeToyota
A310ModelSupra
1984Model year2000
—Body typeCoupe
—Seats4
—Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,1 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement2997 cc
150 HPPower330 HP
0 NmTorque440 Nm
—Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption14,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,3 lt
—Average consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size225/50 ZR16; 245/50 ZR16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4520 mm
—Width1810 mm
—Height1275 mm
—Weight1570 Kg
—Wheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1984 Alpine A310 and 2000 Toyota Supra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Supra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 35.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…