2012 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost (240 Hp) 2012Overall Score73.75/100
2012 Ford Mondeo vs 2012 Skoda Superb Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Skoda
Superb
Skoda Superb 3.6 FSI (260 Hp) 2012Overall Score78.75/100
WINNER
Skoda Superb
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 5 points.
73.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationSkoda Superb
FordMakeSkoda
MondeoModelSuperb
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationSkoda Superb
7,5 s0–100 km/h6,6 s
246 km/hTop speed247 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement3597 cc
240 HPPower260 HP
340 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationSkoda Superb
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption14,4 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption10,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationSkoda Superb
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 PowerShiftGears6
205/55 R16Tyre size205/55 R16; 225/45 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationSkoda Superb
4784 mmLength4838 mm
1886 mmWidth1817 mm
1500 mmHeight1510 mm
1569 KgWeight1746 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2761 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Ford Mondeo and 2012 Skoda Superb approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Skoda Superb leads the E-Kıyasla score by 5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…