2012 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 2.0 EcoBoost (240 Hp) 2012Overall Score73.75/100
2012 Ford Mondeo vs 2017 Skoda Superb Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Skoda
Superb
Skoda Superb Comfort 2017 1.6 TDI 120 HPOverall Score69.5/100
WINNER
Ford Mondeo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 4.25 points.
73.75–69.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationSkoda Superb
FordMakeSkoda
MondeoModelSuperb
2012Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationSkoda Superb
7,5 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
246 km/hTop speed206 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
240 HPPower120 HP
340 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationSkoda Superb
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank66 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption4,6 lt
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationSkoda Superb
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 PowerShiftGears7
—TransmissionDSG
205/55 R16Tyre size17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationSkoda Superb
4784 mmLength4861 mm
1886 mmWidth1864 mm
1500 mmHeight1468 mm
1569 KgWeight1530 kg
—Luggage capacity595 lt
2850 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Ford Mondeo and 2017 Skoda Superb approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 4.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…