DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Mondeo vs 2016 Fiat Toro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Fiat Toro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeFiat
MondeoModelToro
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h—
232 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
203 HPPower170 HP
345 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption—
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R16; 235/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19Tyre size225/70 R16; 225/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4871 mmLength4915 mm
1852 mmWidth1844 mm
1482 mmHeight1746 mm
1564 KgWeight1709 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2990 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Mondeo and 2016 Fiat Toro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Fiat Toro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…