DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Ford Mondeo vs 2006 Lancia Phedra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Phedra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

56.25–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeLancia
MondeoModelPhedra
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

13,2 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
180 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
90 HPPower136 HP
245 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
56 ltFuel tank80 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption12,3 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4731 mmLength4750 mm
1812 mmWidth1863 mm
1429 mmHeight1760 mm
1492 KgWeight1575 Kg
2754 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Ford Mondeo and 2006 Lancia Phedra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Phedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…