DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Ford Mondeo vs 2004 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V50

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 5.25 points.

59.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeVolvo
MondeoModelV50
2003Model year2004
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,8 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
215 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
145 HPPower136 HP
190 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
58 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4731 mmLength4514 mm
1812 mmWidth1770 mm
1429 mmHeight1452 mm
1376 KgWeight1456 Kg
2754 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Ford Mondeo and 2004 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V50 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 5.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…