DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford Mondeo vs 1996 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRenault
MondeoModelMegane
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
195 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
115 HPPower98 HP
160 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4480 mmLength4440 mm
1750 mmWidth1699 mm
1430 mmHeight1420 mm
1225 KgWeight1135 Kg
2705 mmWheelbase2580 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford Mondeo and 1996 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…