2003 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 1.8 (125 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.5/100
2003 Ford Mondeo vs 2003 Mazda 323 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 1.8i 16V (114 Hp) 2003Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 323
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationMazda 323
FordMakeMazda
MondeoModel323
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationMazda 323
10,8 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
205 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1840 cc
125 HPPower114 HP
170 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationMazda 323
PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank55 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationMazda 323
4731 mmLength4315 mm
1812 mmWidth1705 mm
1429 mmHeight1410 mm
1373 KgWeight1125 Kg
2754 mmWheelbase2610 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Ford Mondeo and 2003 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…