2010 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 1.6i 16v (125Hp) 2010Overall Score57.25/100
2010 Ford Mondeo vs 2010 Volvo C30 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Volvo
C30
Volvo C30 1.6 (114 Hp) 2010Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Ford Mondeo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationVolvo C30
FordMakeVolvo
MondeoModelC30
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationVolvo C30
12,3 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
125 HPPower114 HP
160 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationVolvo C30
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank52 lt
10,3 ltUrban consumption4,3 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationVolvo C30
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationVolvo C30
4778 mmLength4266 mm
1886 mmWidth1782 mm
1500 mmHeight1447 mm
1477 KgWeight1354 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Ford Mondeo and 2010 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…