2016 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 1.5 EcoBoost (160 Hp) 2016Overall Score70.5/100
2016 Ford Mondeo vs 2013 Volvo S60 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Volvo
S60
Volvo S60 2.0 D4 (181 Hp) 2013Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Volvo S60
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 3.25 points.
70.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationVolvo S60
FordMakeVolvo
MondeoModelS60
2016Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationVolvo S60
9,2 s0–100 km/h7,4 s
222 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1969 cc
160 HPPower181 HP
240 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationVolvo S60
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank67 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,8 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationVolvo S60
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R16; 235/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationVolvo S60
4871 mmLength4635 mm
1852 mmWidth1899 mm
1482 mmHeight1484 mm
1485 KgWeight—
2850 mmWheelbase2776 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Mondeo and 2013 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volvo S60 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 3.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…