2016 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 1.5 EcoBoost (160 Hp) 2016Overall Score70.5/100
2016 Ford Mondeo vs 2013 Volvo S60 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Volvo
S60
Volvo S60 1.6 D2 (115 Hp) 2013Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Ford Mondeo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 10.25 points.
70.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationVolvo S60
FordMakeVolvo
MondeoModelS60
2016Model year2013
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationVolvo S60
9,2 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
222 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
160 HPPower115 HP
240 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationVolvo S60
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank67 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption4,9 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationVolvo S60
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R16; 235/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationVolvo S60
4871 mmLength4635 mm
1852 mmWidth1899 mm
1482 mmHeight1484 mm
1485 KgWeight1635 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2776 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Mondeo and 2013 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 10.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…