DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Mondeo vs 2016 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
RESULT

Tie

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score.

70.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeVolkswagen
MondeoModelCaddy
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeMinivan, Kombi
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
222 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
160 HPPower150 HP
240 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R16; 235/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4871 mmLength4878 mm
1852 mmWidth1793 mm
1482 mmHeight1831 mm
1485 KgWeight1600 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase3006 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Mondeo and 2016 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

The two cars have the same overall E-Kıyasla score. The better choice therefore depends more heavily on priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance and equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…