DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Mondeo vs 2016 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 8.25 points.

70.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRenault
MondeoModelMegane
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

9,2 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
222 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
160 HPPower110 HP
240 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption3,9 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption3,2 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption3,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R16; 235/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19Tyre size205/55 R16 91H; 205/50 R17 89V; 225/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4871 mmLength4299 mm
1852 mmWidth1785 mm
1482 mmHeight1423 mm
1485 KgWeight1205 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Mondeo and 2016 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 8.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…