1996 • Ford
Maverick
Ford Maverick 2.7 TD GL (5 dr) 1996Overall Score52.25/100
1996 Ford Maverick vs 1996 Holden Apollo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Holden
Apollo
Holden Apollo 2.2i 16V GS (125 Hp) 1996Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Holden Apollo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
52.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MaverickSpecificationHolden Apollo
FordMakeHolden
MaverickModelApollo
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford MaverickSpecificationHolden Apollo
16,7 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
155 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2664 ccEngine displacement2164 cc
125 HPPower125 HP
278 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MaverickSpecificationHolden Apollo
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Average consumption10,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MaverickSpecificationHolden Apollo
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15 RTyre size195/70 R14 H
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MaverickSpecificationHolden Apollo
4665 mmLength4725 mm
1755 mmWidth1770 mm
1850 mmHeight1400 mm
1875 KgWeight1350 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Ford Maverick and 1996 Holden Apollo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Holden Apollo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…