DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford Maverick vs 1996 Land Rover Discovery Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Discovery

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

53.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeLand Rover
MaverickModelDiscovery
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h18,5 s
160 km/hTop speed148 km/h
2389 ccEngine displacement2496 cc
118 HPPower113 HP
191 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank88 lt
—Urban consumption11,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt
—Average consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15 RTyre size205/80 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4665 mmLength4520 mm
1755 mmWidth1795 mm
1850 mmHeight1960 mm
1760 KgWeight1925 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford Maverick and 1996 Land Rover Discovery approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Discovery leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…