DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Ford Kuga vs 2012 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KugaSpecificationVolvo S60
FordMakeVolvo
KugaModelS60
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Ford KugaSpecificationVolvo S60
9,9 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
163 HPPower163 HP
340 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KugaSpecificationVolvo S60
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank67 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,9 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KugaSpecificationVolvo S60
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 235/45 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KugaSpecificationVolvo S60
4524 mmLength4628 mm
1838 mmWidth1865 mm
1701 mmHeight1484 mm
1692 KgWeight1582 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Ford Kuga and 2012 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…