DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Ford Kuga vs 2014 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KugaSpecificationMazda 3
FordMakeMazda
KugaModel3
2014Model year2014
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Ford KugaSpecificationMazda 3
10,6 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
190 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
140 HPPower120 HP
320 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KugaSpecificationMazda 3
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank51 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KugaSpecificationMazda 3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 235/45 R19Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KugaSpecificationMazda 3
4524 mmLength4460 mm
1838 mmWidth1795 mm
1702 mmHeight1450 mm
1605 KgWeight1205 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Ford Kuga and 2014 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…