DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Ford Kuga vs 2012 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KugaSpecificationMazda CX-5
FordMakeMazda
KugaModelCX-5
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Ford KugaSpecificationMazda CX-5
10,6 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
190 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
140 HPPower160 HP
320 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KugaSpecificationMazda CX-5
DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank58 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
5,3 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KugaSpecificationMazda CX-5
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 235/45 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KugaSpecificationMazda CX-5
4524 mmLength4555 mm
1838 mmWidth1840 mm
1702 mmHeight1710 mm
1605 KgWeight1488 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Ford Kuga and 2012 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…