DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Ford Kuga vs 2010 Tata Aria Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

49–48.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KugaSpecificationTata Aria
FordMakeTata
KugaModelAria
2010Model year2010
SUVBody type—
5Seats—
5Doors—

Performance

Ford KugaSpecificationTata Aria
9,9 s0–100 km/h—
198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
163 HPPower140 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KugaSpecificationTata Aria
DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KugaSpecificationTata Aria
4x4Drivetrain—
6Gears—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Ford KugaSpecificationTata Aria
4443 mmLength—
1842 mmWidth—
1710 mmHeight—
1692 KgWeight—
2690 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Ford Kuga and 2010 Tata Aria approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…