2010 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 2.0 Duratorq TDCi (163 Hp) 2010Overall Score49/100
2010 Ford Kuga vs 2006 Ford Focus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 1.6 Duratec 16V (100 Hp) 2006Overall Score48.25/100
WINNER
Ford Kuga
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
49–48.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford KugaSpecificationFord Focus
FordMakeFord
KugaModelFocus
2010Model year2006
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Ford KugaSpecificationFord Focus
9,9 s0–100 km/h—
198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
163 HPPower100 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm
Fuel & Consumption
Ford KugaSpecificationFord Focus
DieselFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Ford KugaSpecificationFord Focus
4443 mmLength—
1842 mmWidth—
1710 mmHeight—
1692 KgWeight—
2690 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Ford Kuga and 2006 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…