2012 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost (182 Hp) 2012Overall Score51.25/100
2012 Ford Kuga vs 2015 Ford C-Max Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2015 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 Duratorq TDCi (115 Hp) 2015Overall Score51/100
WINNER
Ford Kuga
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
51.25–51
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford KugaSpecificationFord C-Max
FordMakeFord
KugaModelC-Max
2012Model year2015
SUVBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford KugaSpecificationFord C-Max
9,7 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
200 km/hTop speed184 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
182 HPPower115 HP
0 NmTorque270 Nm
Fuel & Consumption
Ford KugaSpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,2 ltUrban consumption5,4 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Ford KugaSpecificationFord C-Max
4443 mmLength4380 mm
1842 mmWidth1828 mm
1710 mmHeight1626 mm
1682 KgWeight1390 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Ford Kuga and 2015 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
Comments are loading…