2012 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score66.25/100
2012 Ford Kuga vs 2012 Volkswagen Golf Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volkswagen
Golf
Volkswagen Golf 1.4 TSI (140 Hp) 2012Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Ford Kuga
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford KugaSpecificationVolkswagen Golf
FordMakeVolkswagen
KugaModelGolf
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Ford KugaSpecificationVolkswagen Golf
9,7 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
195 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
150 HPPower140 HP
240 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford KugaSpecificationVolkswagen Golf
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford KugaSpecificationVolkswagen Golf
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 235/45 R19Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford KugaSpecificationVolkswagen Golf
4524 mmLength4199 mm
1838 mmWidth1779 mm
1702 mmHeight1479 mm
1580 KgWeight1290 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2578 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Ford Kuga and 2012 Volkswagen Golf approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…