2012 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score66.25/100
2012 Ford Kuga vs 2012 Hyundai i40 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Hyundai
i40
Hyundai i40 1.6 GDI (135 Hp) 2012Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Ford Kuga
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford KugaSpecificationHyundai i40
FordMakeHyundai
KugaModeli40
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford KugaSpecificationHyundai i40
9,7 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
195 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1591 cc
150 HPPower135 HP
240 NmTorque1643 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford KugaSpecificationHyundai i40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,4 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford KugaSpecificationHyundai i40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 235/45 R19Tyre size205/60 R16; 215/50 R17; 225/45 R18
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford KugaSpecificationHyundai i40
4524 mmLength4770 mm
1838 mmWidth1815 mm
1702 mmHeight1470 mm
1580 KgWeight1395 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2770 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Ford Kuga and 2012 Hyundai i40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…