2012 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score66.25/100
2012 Ford Kuga vs 2012 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Alfa Romeo
MiTo
Alfa Romeo MiTo 1.4 MultiAir (135 Hp) 2012Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Ford Kuga
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford KugaSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
FordMakeAlfa Romeo
KugaModelMiTo
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors2/3
Performance
Ford KugaSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
9,7 s0–100 km/h8,4 s
195 km/hTop speed207 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1368 cc
150 HPPower135 HP
240 NmTorque206 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford KugaSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford KugaSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 235/45 R19Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford KugaSpecificationAlfa Romeo MiTo
4524 mmLength4060 mm
1838 mmWidth1720 mm
1702 mmHeight1440 mm
1580 KgWeight1135 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2511 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Ford Kuga and 2012 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…