2012 • Ford
Kuga
Ford Kuga 1.6 EcoBoost (150 Hp) 2012Overall Score66.25/100
2012 Ford Kuga vs 2012 Citroen C4 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Citroen
C4
Citroen C4 1.6 THP (156 Hp) 2012Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Ford Kuga
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford KugaSpecificationCitroen C4
FordMakeCitroen
KugaModelC4
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeMinivan, MPV
5Seats7
5Doors5
Performance
Ford KugaSpecificationCitroen C4
9,7 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
195 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
150 HPPower156 HP
240 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford KugaSpecificationCitroen C4
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption7,.0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford KugaSpecificationCitroen C4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 EGS
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 235/45 R19Tyre size215/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford KugaSpecificationCitroen C4
4524 mmLength4590 mm
1838 mmWidth1830 mm
1702 mmHeight1660-1710 mm
1580 KgWeight1517 Kg
2690 mmWheelbase2728 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Ford Kuga and 2012 Citroen C4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…