DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Ford KA vs 2017 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KASpecificationRenault Clio
FordMakeRenault
KAModelClio
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Ford KASpecificationRenault Clio
—0–100 km/h11,19 s
0 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
110 HPPower110 HP
146 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KASpecificationRenault Clio
Petrol / Ethanol – E85Fuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KASpecificationRenault Clio
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
175/65 R14; 195/55 R15Tyre size185/65 R15; 195/55 R16; 205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KASpecificationRenault Clio
4254 mmLength4062 mm
1695 mmWidth1731 mm
1460 mmHeight1448 mm
1032 KgWeight1204-1205 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2589 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Ford KA and 2017 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…