DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Ford KA vs 2014 Nissan Pulsar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pulsar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeNissan
KAModelPulsar
2014Model year2014
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,5 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
110 HPPower110 HP
146 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / Ethanol – E85Fuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank46 lt
—Urban consumption4,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,3 lt
—Average consumption3,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
175/65 R14; 195/55 R15Tyre size195/60 R16; 205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4254 mmLength4387 mm
1695 mmWidth1768 mm
1460 mmHeight1520 mm
1032 KgWeight1270-1352 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Ford KA and 2014 Nissan Pulsar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pulsar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…