DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Ford KA vs 2006 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford KA

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KASpecificationOpel Combo
FordMakeOpel
KAModelCombo
2006Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Ford KASpecificationOpel Combo
14,1 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
167 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
70 HPPower70 HP
106 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KASpecificationOpel Combo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank52 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KASpecificationOpel Combo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/60 R14Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KASpecificationOpel Combo
3620 mmLength4322 mm
1639 mmWidth1684 mm
1383 mmHeight1801 mm
890 KgWeight1325 Kg
2448 mmWheelbase2716 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Ford KA and 2006 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford KA leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…