DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Ford KA vs 2002 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford KA

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeCitroen
KAModelXsara
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

14,1 s0–100 km/h16,7 s
167 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
70 HPPower68 HP
106 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank54 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/60 R14Tyre size195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3620 mmLength4167 mm
1639 mmWidth1698 mm
1383 mmHeight1405 mm
890 KgWeight1120 Kg
2448 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Ford KA and 2002 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford KA leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…