DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Ford KA vs 2002 Perodua Kelisa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Perodua Kelisa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

43.25–43.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakePerodua
KAModelKelisa
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

15,4 s0–100 km/h14,8 s
155 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement989 cc
60 HPPower56 HP
105 NmTorque88 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank40 lt
8,6 ltUrban consumption5,3 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
—Average consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size155/70 R12
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3620 mmLength3480 mm
1639 mmWidth1490 mm
1383 mmHeight1425 mm
890 KgWeight775 Kg
2448 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Ford KA and 2002 Perodua Kelisa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Perodua Kelisa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…