DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Ford KA vs 2000 Ford Fiesta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Fiesta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

38.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KASpecificationFord Fiesta
FordMakeFord
KAModelFiesta
1998Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

Ford KASpecificationFord Fiesta
17,7 s0–100 km/h19,5 s
147 km/hTop speed143 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
50 HPPower50 HP
97 NmTorque97 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KASpecificationFord Fiesta
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank42 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption8,7 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KASpecificationFord Fiesta
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KASpecificationFord Fiesta
3620 mmLength3828 mm
1639 mmWidth1634 mm
1383 mmHeight1320 mm
870 KgWeight920 Kg
2448 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Ford KA and 2000 Ford Fiesta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Fiesta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…