DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Ford KA vs 2001 Citroen Saxo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Saxo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 4.75 points.

38.5–43.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KASpecificationCitroen Saxo
FordMakeCitroen
KAModelSaxo
1998Model year2001
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

Ford KASpecificationCitroen Saxo
17,7 s0–100 km/h18,3 s
147 km/hTop speed158 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1527 cc
50 HPPower57 HP
97 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KASpecificationCitroen Saxo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank45 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KASpecificationCitroen Saxo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KASpecificationCitroen Saxo
3620 mmLength3718 mm
1639 mmWidth1595 mm
1383 mmHeight1368 mm
870 KgWeight890 Kg
2448 mmWheelbase2385 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Ford KA and 2001 Citroen Saxo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Saxo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 4.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…