DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Ford KA vs 2000 Tata Indica Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Tata Indica

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

38.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KASpecificationTata Indica
FordMakeTata
KAModelIndica
1997Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Ford KASpecificationTata Indica
17,7 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
147 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1405 cc
50 HPPower49 HP
97 NmTorque85 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KASpecificationTata Indica
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank37 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KASpecificationTata Indica
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size155/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KASpecificationTata Indica
3620 mmLength3660 mm
1639 mmWidth1625 mm
1383 mmHeight1485 mm
870 KgWeight1005 Kg
2448 mmWheelbase2400 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Ford KA and 2000 Tata Indica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Tata Indica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…