DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Ford KA vs 2000 Mazda 121 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 121

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

38.5–39.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KASpecificationMazda 121
FordMakeMazda
KAModel121
1997Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

Ford KASpecificationMazda 121
17,7 s0–100 km/h19,0 s
147 km/hTop speed143 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
50 HPPower50 HP
97 NmTorque97 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KASpecificationMazda 121
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank42 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KASpecificationMazda 121
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size165/70 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KASpecificationMazda 121
3620 mmLength3828 mm
1639 mmWidth1634 mm
1383 mmHeight1330 mm
870 KgWeight930 Kg
2448 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Ford KA and 2000 Mazda 121 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 121 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…