DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Ford KA vs 1996 Fiat 126 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford KA

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 2 points.

38.5–36.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KASpecificationFiat 126
FordMakeFiat
KAModel126
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats4
3Doors3

Performance

Ford KASpecificationFiat 126
17,7 s0–100 km/h33,0 s
147 km/hTop speed116 km/h
1299 ccEngine displacement704 cc
50 HPPower26 HP
97 NmTorque49 Nm
4Cylinders2

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KASpecificationFiat 126
PetrolFuel typePetrol
42 ltFuel tank21 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
4,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KASpecificationFiat 126
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
155/70 R13Tyre size135/70 R13
YesABS—

Dimensions

Ford KASpecificationFiat 126
3620 mmLength3105 mm
1639 mmWidth1375 mm
1383 mmHeight1345 mm
870 KgWeight645 Kg
2448 mmWheelbase1840 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Ford KA and 1996 Fiat 126 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford KA leads the E-Kıyasla score by 2 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…