DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Ford KA vs 2014 Alfa Romeo MiTo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo MiTo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeAlfa Romeo
KAModelMiTo
2014Model year2014
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
4Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,9 s
0 km/hTop speed174 km/h
997 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
85 HPPower85 HP
105 NmTorque200 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / Ethanol – E85Fuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption4,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption2,9 lt
—Average consumption3,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14; 195/55 R15Tyre size195/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4254 mmLength4063 mm
1695 mmWidth1720 mm
1460 mmHeight1446 mm
1022 KgWeight1150 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2511 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Ford KA and 2014 Alfa Romeo MiTo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo MiTo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…