DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Ford KA vs 2015 Mitsubishi Attrage Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford KA

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

57.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMitsubishi
KAModelAttrage
2015Model year2015
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,0 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
997 ccEngine displacement1193 cc
80 HPPower80 HP
100 NmTorque106 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank42 lt
—Urban consumption5,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—TransmissionManual
175/65 R14; 195/55 R15Tyre size15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4254 mmLength4245 mm
1695 mmWidth1670 mm
1460 mmHeight1515 mm
1022 KgWeight930 kg
—Luggage capacity450 lt
2491 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Ford KA

No additional feature records are available.

Mitsubishi AttrageDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPCruise ControlTrip ComputerKeyless StartPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRain SensorLight SensorUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Ford KA and 2015 Mitsubishi Attrage approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford KA leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…