DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Ford GT vs 2006 Audi RS 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi RS 6

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 5 points.

91.5–96.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford GTSpecificationAudi RS 6
FordMakeAudi
GTModelRS 6
2006Model year2006
CoupeBody typeSedan
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

Ford GTSpecificationAudi RS 6
3,6 s0–100 km/h4,9 s
330 km/hTop speed250 km/h
5409 ccEngine displacement4172 cc
557 HPPower450 HP
678 NmTorque560 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

Ford GTSpecificationAudi RS 6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank82 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption21,8 lt
11,2 ltExtra-urban consumption10,4 lt
—Average consumption14,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford GTSpecificationAudi RS 6
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5 Tiptronic
235/45 ZR18; 315/40 ZR19Tyre size255/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford GTSpecificationAudi RS 6
4645 mmLength4858 mm
1955 mmWidth1850 mm
1125 mmHeight1387-1426 mm
1610 KgWeight1840 Kg
2710 mmWheelbase2759 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Ford GT and 2006 Audi RS 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi RS 6 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…