1985 • Ford
Granada
Ford Granada 2.5 D (69 Hp) 1985Overall Score40.25/100
1985 Ford Granada vs 1998 Mazda 626 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Mazda
626
Mazda 626 2.0 (116 Hp) 1998Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 626
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 13 points.
40.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford GranadaSpecificationMazda 626
FordMakeMazda
GranadaModel626
1985Model year1998
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford GranadaSpecificationMazda 626
—0–100 km/h10,6 s
0 km/hTop speed192 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
69 HPPower116 HP
0 NmTorque173 Nm
—Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford GranadaSpecificationMazda 626
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank64 lt
—Urban consumption10,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Ford GranadaSpecificationMazda 626
4630 mmLength4660 mm
1740 mmWidth1710 mm
1380 mmHeight1515 mm
—Weight1280 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1985 Ford Granada and 1998 Mazda 626 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 13 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
Comments are loading…