DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Ford Galaxy vs 1999 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Galaxy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

60.25–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeSuzuki
GalaxyModelGrand Vitara
2000Model year1999
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,6 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
193 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2792 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
174 HPPower173 HP
235 NmTorque231 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank66 lt
17,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,1 lt
—Average consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15 HTyre size235/60 R16 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4641 mmLength4700 mm
1810 mmWidth1780 mm
1730 mmHeight1740 mm
1835 KgWeight1680 Kg
2835 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Ford Galaxy and 1999 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…