2009 • Ford
Galaxy
Ford Galaxy 2.3 i 16V (161 Hp) 2009Overall Score63.25/100
2009 Ford Galaxy vs 2009 Mitsubishi Eclipse Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • Mitsubishi
Eclipse
Mitsubishi Eclipse 2.4 L (162 Hp) 2009Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Ford Galaxy
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford GalaxySpecificationMitsubishi Eclipse
FordMakeMitsubishi
GalaxyModelEclipse
2009Model year2009
MinivanBody typeCoupe
7Seats4
5Doors3
Performance
Ford GalaxySpecificationMitsubishi Eclipse
11,6 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
191 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2261 ccEngine displacement2378 cc
161 HPPower162 HP
208 NmTorque217 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford GalaxySpecificationMitsubishi Eclipse
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank0 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford GalaxySpecificationMitsubishi Eclipse
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
215/60R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford GalaxySpecificationMitsubishi Eclipse
4820 mmLength—
1854 mmWidth—
1723 mmHeight—
1625 KgWeight—
2850 mmWheelbase—
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Ford Galaxy and 2009 Mitsubishi Eclipse approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…