DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Galaxy vs 2016 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Galaxy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeJaguar
GalaxyModelXF
2016Model year2016
MinivanBody typeSedan
5/7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
214 km/hTop speed229 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
210 HPPower163 HP
450 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption4,8 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,6 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption4,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6 PowershiftGears6
235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 245/45 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4848 mmLength4954 mm
1916 mmWidth1987 mm
1747 mmHeight1457 mm
1704 KgWeight1545 Kg
2849 mmWheelbase2960 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Galaxy and 2016 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…