2006 • Ford
Galaxy
Ford Galaxy 2.0 TDCi (130 Hp) 2006Overall Score62.5/100
2006 Ford Galaxy vs 2006 Land Rover Freelander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Land Rover
Freelander
Land Rover Freelander 1.8 i 16V (117 Hp) 2006Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Ford Galaxy
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
62.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford GalaxySpecificationLand Rover Freelander
FordMakeLand Rover
GalaxyModelFreelander
2006Model year2006
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford GalaxySpecificationLand Rover Freelander
11,2 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
188 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
130 HPPower117 HP
320 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford GalaxySpecificationLand Rover Freelander
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford GalaxySpecificationLand Rover Freelander
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
215/60R16Tyre size195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford GalaxySpecificationLand Rover Freelander
4820 mmLength4368 mm
1854 mmWidth1809 mm
1723 mmHeight1708 mm
1735 KgWeight1510 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2557 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Ford Galaxy and 2006 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…